‘It’s deeply saddening’: the way thirty confined beluga whales are now tools in dispute over animal welfare.
Jelly Bean’s offspring Bertie is an charming little “playful character”. The whale Orion – nicknamed “Onion Ring” – is a big but fiercely protective companion. Zephyr has “constant motion” and wiggles like a wiggly creature. Lillooet the beluga is the “loving presence” with a gentle spirit.
A group of thirty captive beluga whales in a Canadian amusement park have been caught in a tussle between a closed attraction, public officials and animal rights activists.
But those closest to the whales say the intense controversy over their destiny often ignores the individual traits of the whales who, after living their entire lives in enclosed habitats, have been thoroughly researched by the people who see them each day.
After the Canadian government blocked the export of the belugas to China, the struggling attraction near the famous falls where they are held threatened to put them down unless the authorities covers the expense of their care. Canada’s marine resources official has rejected that request, placing the thirty whales in an dangerously unstable situation.
Intelligent Sea Creatures
Researchers say that beluga whales’ neural makeup, along with their mimicry abilities, cognitive challenges and communal behavior indicate they are highly cognitive animals – something Kristy Burgess discovered first-hand.
She spent several years as a marine mammal specialist, a role that involved building relationships of the aquatic animals.
“Establishing those bonds over time takes a lot of consistency and a lot of affection. At the beginning, they’re very wary of you,” she said. “Eventually, you gain shared confidence. And they start being more trusting with you. It’s just so wonderful and gratifying.”
Burgess knew the whales were exceptionally cognitive, but she says she was even so astounded by the nuances and idiosyncrasies in their dispositions. She formed a special affection for Eve and Cleopatra with contrasting temperaments.
“One whale selected me. The other made me earn it,” she said. “Each changed the way I understand connection.”
Public Concerns and Facility Decline
Burgess’s interaction with the whales evolved against a background of increasing societal concern to their confinement.
During her tenure at the park, multiple belugas and the park’s one killer whale, the orca, passed away. In total, 19 belugas have perished at the park since 2019, a statistic which the park ascribes to expected lifespan, but which activists say reflects the poor conditions in which they were maintained.
The facility did not admit visitors to the visitors over the summer, but Burgess says she saw with her own eyes results of the cessation. “Concrete is breaking off from the pools because they’re falling apart and not being fixed. The whales are exploratory and so they grab fragments and swim around with pieces in their jaws. It’s upsetting to see.”
The facility did not reply to a request for comment, but earlier claimed: “The whales … receive far superior veterinary services and around the clock supervision than any person in the UK, or anywhere else.”
Fate in Limbo and Potential Resolutions
Burgess was fired from the facility in the spring following the passing of Eos, an unwell beluga the caretakers had to euthanize. She said the park thought particulars of the incident were disclosed to the news outlets and she was let go shortly thereafter.
The lack of clarity over the whales’ outcome has left Burgess and staff members in anguish. She says the facility’s warning to euthanize its whales is a bargaining chip and is a “extremely difficult” undertaking, adding any plans to humanely kill even a single beluga would require “considerable manpower”, equipment and machinery.
“It cannot happen in hell the caretakers would ever do it,” she said.
Burgess advocates for requests for the whales to be removed right away from the facility, with its crumbling tanks and shrinking team.
In the autumn, the nation’s fisheries minister denied a bid to transfer the whales to China.
“To approve the application would have meant a ongoing situation in enclosure and a return to display for amusement,” the minister wrote. “As Canadians, we know that belugas belong in the wild, not in pools for our enjoyment. I could not in clear conscience permit an export that would perpetuate the situation these belugas have suffered.”
But the former trainer said the official’s statements reflect a broader misunderstanding of the facts of life for belugas raised in confinement.
“The public needs to understand these are whales that have lived entirely in captivity and they will need ongoing assistance for the rest of their years,” she said. “The public just don’t comprehend that it’s not as simple as saying ‘end operations’.”
Alternative Habitat and Ongoing Debate
As authorities work to find a answer, ideas have been put forward, some of which have little basis in reality. A suggested plan called for the belugas to be released into the natural habitat of Canada’s north – where whales are a key source of food for local populations.
A suggested protected area in the province of eastern Canada, which recently received official endorsement, has shown to be most controversial. The future facility, which includes 100 acres of protected cove, doesn’t yet exist. Proponents remain hopeful that it could eventually represent a long term solution for a number of the whales.
But, Burgess says, among trainers she’s discussed with, there is “no trust there” about what she said is “simply an untested concept” in the whales’ future.
Different voices say the prospect of a protected habitat reflects a changing attitudes away from zoos and aquariums and could represent a feasible approach in the short term.
The project lead, director of the initiative, said the site will mimic the intellectual stimulation and feeding regimen the whales receive from specialists, albeit in a significantly bigger area. He said after the well-being of whales is completely examined, which could take months|an extended period|