🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places at risk from coastal erosion state that indecision on how best to address the issue is creating avoidable anguish about the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Danger to Ancient Graveyards

The council have singled out three church graveyards in the communities of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being at risk of being swallowed by the ocean in the next few generations.

A newly published study on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in safer locations. Officials maintain it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to be their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one graveyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen far earlier. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that people’s remains will just get washed out to sea. They won’t. Individuals will take bones as souvenirs and go grave robbing in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I would feel appalled by that.”

A Soldier's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier killed while working overseas. His parent expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting resting place,” she said. “To our family it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is premature to exhume existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an early decision needs to be made when a tipping point has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of agreement over when and how to handle the problem has left bereaved families feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the inevitable erosion and to allow burials to continue for now. Different voices contend the moment for relocation is approaching.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is taken forward. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the graveyards were under the care of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to decide the path to take. We are here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “We are talking decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should be done yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each village.”

The possibility of the loss of the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the area,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in life after death, providing a theological viewpoint on the physical loss of sacred ground.